Personal AI Core
Component AA private home computer responsible for:
- Local AI
- Encrypted memory
- Retrieval
- Reasoning
- Long-term personal context
I'm exploring what happens when Personal AI isn't something you download one day, but something that learns alongside you for a lifetime.
I'm starting with my own family.
AI is going to become part of their lives whether I build this or not.
My question is what kind of AI I would actually want them to grow up with.
I want them to have an intelligence that works for them. One that understands their history, helps them learn, helps them think, and eventually helps them understand themselves.
But for me to trust something with that role, the architecture has to be different.
Their memories should belong to them.
Their AI should be private.
It should know the difference between something that happened and something it inferred.
It should strengthen human agency rather than replace it.
And it should become more useful as they grow.
So I'm starting the experiment now.
Not because the technology is finished.
Because I want to spend years understanding how to build it correctly.
Today's AI knows an extraordinary amount about the world and comparatively little about the person asking the question. Personal AI reverses that.
Every conversation starts from zero. The model is brilliant and the relationship is amnesiac.
Experiences become structured, private memory. Memory becomes an intelligence that actually knows who it is talking to.
The better an intelligence understands you, the better it can help you.
Two components, both private by construction. One lives at home and thinks. One goes out into the day and listens — only when told to.
A private home computer responsible for:
A small ambient device responsible for:
V1 is an experiment, not a consumer product.
The goal is not to ship hardware quickly.
The goal is to understand every layer of the Personal AI stack — capture, memory, retrieval, reasoning, and the trust model that holds it together — by living with it.
A lightweight walk-through of the loop the prototype is built around. Step through it — and ask the AI to show its work.
“Dad, I want to make my tower taller than me.”
observed ≠ inferred
Her“Have I always liked building things?”
“You've repeatedly gravitated toward building things since early childhood. One of the earliest examples I have is a block tower you built with your dad when you were four — you wanted it taller than you, and you kept going after it fell several times.”
The belief is not a vibe. It points at specific, dated memories the person can open, question, correct, or delete. If the evidence goes away, so should the belief.
What this is meant to showAI beliefs should have evidence.
The order matters: each stage has to be understood before the next one is trustworthy.
Understand how experiences can become useful memories.
Develop durable, structured Personal Memory.
Allow the person to begin interacting with their AI.
The AI learns how the individual learns, thinks, communicates, and changes.
Control gradually moves from the parent to the individual.
Models change. Hardware changes. The person's memory remains.
The experiment may last decades.
That is the point. A Personal AI that is meant to accompany a life cannot be validated in a quarter. The first real test of stage six is a person in their twenties asking a question only their own history can answer.
These are architectural commitments, not policies. If the design makes them hard to break, no future incentive gets to renegotiate them.
Personal information should not need to leave the person's environment to be useful.
The individual, not the AI company, owns the record of their life. They can read it, correct it, export it, or erase it — and no one else can.
The system must always know the difference between what happened and what it concluded, and be able to show which is which.
The goal is a person who thinks better, not a person who thinks less. The AI informs decisions; it does not quietly make them.
Recording has a switch you can feel and a light you can see. Anyone in the room should be able to tell whether the device is listening.
Models will be replaced and hardware will fail. The memory format has to survive both, so the person never has to start over.
This is an experiment, so most of the work is figuring out what is actually true. These are the questions currently shaping it. Notes, findings, and failures will be published here as the work progresses.
If one of these is your area, the Join section is for you.
Raw audio is too much and a summary is too little. What compressed, structured form keeps what will matter in twenty years without keeping everything?
Every conclusion the AI holds about a person should carry its sources. What does that data model look like, and how does it degrade gracefully when sources are deleted?
A four-year-old cannot consent, and neither can the other children on the playground. What controls, defaults, and deletion rights make this defensible — and when does control transfer to the child?
Everything runs on a machine at home with no internet. Where is the capability curve for local models today, and what has to be true for it to be enough?
The model that extracts a memory in 2026 will be obsolete by 2030. The memory must remain legible and useful to whatever comes next.
Children are not small adults. Interests, language, and reasoning all shift. How should the system distinguish a stable trait from a passing phase?
This is not a company yet, and it isn't raising money. It is a long problem, worked on slowly, by people who think it matters.
I'm looking for technically excellent, thoughtful people who believe an AI should deeply understand the person it serves — and who take privacy, safety, and human agency seriously enough to build differently because of it.
If that's you, I'd like to compare notes. The bar is care, not credentials.